Top 18 Continuous Penetration Testing Platforms in 2026
Not all PTaaS platforms are the same. Some test web apps. Some test networks. Some use AI. Some use humans. This guide breaks down what each platform actually does — so you can choose the one that matches what you actually need.
Contents
This guide covers the six platform categories, then reviews each of the top 18 continuous penetration testing platforms using the same format — strengths, gaps, best fit, pricing and a Our verdict.
- Aikido
- Beagle Security
- Equixly
- Horizon3 NodeZero
- Astra Security
- Blacklock
- BreachLock
- Edgescan
- Intruder
- RADAR
- Cobalt
- HackerOne
- Synack
- NetSPI
- Bishop Fox
- Osec Incenter
- Pentera
- XM Cyber
- Cytix
- Mindgard
- Side-by-side comparison
- How to choose
- Talk to Disruptors
Why most PTaaS comparisons get it wrong
Most "best PTaaS" lists rank platforms as if they all compete for the same use case. They don't. The continuous penetration testing market splits into five distinct categories, and a buyer choosing the wrong category wastes budget and leaves real gaps in coverage. A crowdsourced bug bounty platform is not a substitute for CREST-certified pen testing. An autonomous AI scanner is not a substitute for a human validating business logic. A developer-first AppSec tool is not a substitute for an external attack surface programme.
Below we break the market down into the six categories that actually matter, then review the top 18 platforms in 2026 — including BreachLock, Cobalt, HackerOne, Intruder, Aikido, NodeZero, Blacklock, Edgescan, Beagle Security, Equixly, Osec Incenter, Pentera, XM Cyber, Mindgard and others — using the same honest format for each.
The six categories
Always-on external and internal scanning with human validation on demand. Best for compliance-driven organisations needing year-round assurance.
AI agents that attempt full exploit chains without a human in the loop. Strong breadth, weaker on business logic and compliance sign-off.
Marketplace of vetted researchers paid per finding. Good for breadth, harder to use for compliance.
Deep internal network testing, Active Directory, lateral movement. Built for large enterprise with dedicated security teams.
SAST, DAST and code review integrated into CI/CD. Built for engineering teams, not security buyers.
Specialist platforms for testing LLMs, AI agents and AI applications against adversarial attacks. A distinct and growing category separate from traditional PTaaS — designed for organisations building or deploying AI products.
The top 18 platforms in 2026
Not ranked. Order is alphabetical so no platform or service looks like it is being placed first. Same honest format for every vendor — where RADAR has gaps we say so.
- Autonomous AI Pen TestingVendor profile
Aikido
Developer-first AI security platform unifying SAST, DAST, secrets and cloud posture with autonomous testing features.
What it does well- Excellent developer UX and CI/CD integration
- Consolidates multiple AppSec tools into one console
- Fast time to first finding
What it doesn't do- Not positioned as accredited human pen test delivery
- Compliance evidence still typically needs a separate human test
Best forEngineering-led organisations consolidating AppSec tooling under one roof.PricingPublished tiered subscription pricingOur verdictA genuinely strong developer-first platform. If your buyer is the CTO, Aikido is hard to beat. If your buyer is a CISO with an auditor at the door, you'll still need a human pen test layer.
- Continuous Attack Surface PTaaSVendor profile
Astra Security
CREST-certified hybrid AI + human PTaaS targeting web, API, mobile and cloud, with a developer-friendly portal.
What it does well- CREST certified with a clear hybrid AI + human model
- Good coverage of web, API, mobile and cloud in one platform
- Transparent published pricing tiers
What it doesn't do- Internal network testing depth varies vs enterprise-focused vendors
- Smaller UK / EU footprint than locally-anchored providers
Best forEngineering-led companies wanting hybrid testing and a developer-friendly findings flow.PricingPublished tiered subscription pricingOur verdictA strong, honest competitor in the same hybrid lane as RADAR. The service is good — the deciding factor is usually who you trust to validate findings against your compliance frameworks.
- Autonomous AI Pen TestingVendor profile
Beagle Security
Agentic AI penetration testing platform for web applications and APIs, trained on 350,000+ real-world pen test workflows. Continuous, developer-friendly and transparently priced.
What it does well- Genuinely transparent published pricing — rare in this market
- Strong CI/CD integration for developer and DevSecOps teams
- Claims zero false positives through AI-driven exploit confirmation
What it doesn't do- Web apps and APIs only — no infrastructure, network, SAST, SBOM or mobile testing
- No human pen testers — AI validation only, no CREST certified sign-off
- No auditor-ready human-signed reports or pen test certificates
Best forDev and DevSecOps teams at SaaS companies wanting continuous automated application security testing at transparent subscription pricing.PricingEssential $119/mo · Advanced $359/mo · Enterprise custom.Our verdictA well-priced entry point for continuous AI-driven web and API testing. The coverage is deliberately narrow — buyers needing infrastructure testing, human validation or compliance-grade reports will need to look elsewhere or pair it with another platform.
- Continuous Attack Surface PTaaSVendor profile
Blacklock
Automated continuous penetration testing platform combining 24+ pen testing tools with AI-powered triage across web apps, APIs, infrastructure, LLM endpoints, SAST and SBOM.
What it does well- Broad asset coverage including LLM/AI endpoints and SBOM — uncommon in this category
- AI triage reduces false positives before findings reach the security team
- Agentless by design — nothing to install, no changes to infrastructure required
What it doesn't do- No built-in human pen test layer — validation and exploitation require a separate service or partner
- Not sold direct to end buyers in most markets — accessed through authorised resellers and distributors
- Auditor-ready human-signed reports and pen test certificates require a human layer on top
Best forManaged service providers, resellers and distributors building a continuous pen testing offering on top of a capable automated platform.PricingPer-asset annual licence through authorised channel partners — not published direct.Our verdictA capable and genuinely broad automated platform. The software does the heavy lifting — buyers who also need human validation, auditor-ready reports or a pen test certificate will need to confirm what their chosen partner provides on top.
- Continuous Attack Surface PTaaSVendor profile
BreachLock
Hybrid AI + human PTaaS with a broad services menu spanning web, API, network, cloud and red team.
What it does well- Wide service catalogue under one contract
- In-house testers and a unified findings dashboard
- Strong presence with US mid-market and enterprise buyers
What it doesn't do- Pricing is quote-based and varies significantly by scope
- Less transparent on CREST coverage than UK-anchored providers
Best forBuyers who want a single vendor to cover many test types under one contract.PricingCustom / enterpriseOur verdictStrong breadth and a credible hybrid model. If you want a long supplier list collapsed to one, BreachLock is a serious option — just expect a real procurement cycle.
- Crowdsourced PTaaSVendor profile
Cobalt
Pioneer PTaaS platform built on a vetted researcher pool with a structured pentest workflow.
What it does well- Established PTaaS workflow with predictable test windows
- Vetted researcher network
- Good integrations into developer tooling
What it doesn't do- Engagements are time-boxed rather than truly continuous
- Pricing scales quickly with scope and frequency
Best forTeams that want pen tests delivered as a service but in defined sprints.PricingCredit-based / customOur verdictHelped define the PTaaS category. If your model is several scoped tests per year inside a platform, Cobalt is a safe choice. Continuous coverage is where it gets expensive.
- Developer-First SecurityVendor profile
Cytix
Change-triggered continuous testing that fires pen tests when code or infrastructure changes.
What it does well- Tests triggered by real change events, not arbitrary schedules
- Tight fit with modern CI/CD workflows
- Reduces wasted testing on unchanged surface area
What it doesn't do- Newer entrant — smaller install base than incumbents
- Best for organisations already operating mature DevSecOps
Best forEngineering-led teams that want pen testing to follow deployment events.PricingCustomOur verdictA clever model that fits modern release cadences. Most useful as part of a stack rather than a single answer to compliance-grade pen testing.
- Continuous Attack Surface PTaaSVendor profile
Edgescan
CREST accredited continuous PTaaS platform combining automated scanning, AI-powered validation and in-house CREST and OSCP certified pen testers across web apps, APIs, infrastructure, mobile and cloud. ISO 27001 certified.
What it does well- CREST accredited organisation with CREST and OSCP certified in-house testers — all full-time employees, not freelancers
- Genuinely broad coverage including mobile application testing (iOS and Android) built into the platform
- Unlimited retesting included as standard — no additional cost per retest
What it doesn't do- Pricing is not published — all quotes are custom, which adds friction for buyers wanting transparent per-asset costs
- Less well known in the UK mid-market than some US-origin competitors despite CREST accreditation
Best forOrganisations wanting a CREST accredited continuous PTaaS platform with broad coverage including mobile, and in-house testers rather than a crowdsourced or freelance model.PricingCustom — contact for quote.Our verdictOne of the more credible full-stack PTaaS options in the market. CREST accreditation, in-house testers and mobile coverage in a single platform are a strong combination. Pricing opacity is the main friction point for buyers who want to self-serve a quote.
- Autonomous AI Pen TestingVendor profile
Equixly
Agentic AI platform purpose-built for continuous API and web application penetration testing. Founded 2022, Florence-based, raised €10M Series A in December 2025 and expanding to the UK in 2026.
What it does well- Purpose-built for API-first architectures — stronger on API business logic testing than general DAST tools
- Continuous autonomous testing with no fixed scope or testing window
- ISO 27001 certified with partnerships with Wiz and Checkmarx
What it doesn't do- APIs and web applications only — no infrastructure, network, mobile, SAST or SBOM
- No human pen testers and no CREST accreditation
- No auditor-ready human-signed reports or pen test certificates
Best forEnterprise organisations with complex API-first architectures who want continuous autonomous API security testing embedded in their SDLC.PricingCustom — contact for quote. One-off test options also available.Our verdictA technically strong platform for API-heavy environments. The AI approach to business logic testing is genuinely differentiated from standard DAST tools. Compliance-driven buyers and those needing broader coverage beyond APIs will need to supplement with other platforms.
- Crowdsourced PTaaSVendor profile
HackerOne
The category-defining crowdsourced platform, now extended with agentic AI triage and pentest services.
What it does well- Largest researcher community in the market
- Mature triage workflows and disclosure tooling
- Strong brand with enterprise security teams
What it doesn't do- Per-finding economics can be unpredictable
- Crowdsourced reports don't always map cleanly to compliance scopes
Best forMature security teams running ongoing public or private bug bounty programmes.PricingCustom / enterprise (plus per-finding payouts)Our verdictUnmatched for crowdsourced breadth. Not a like-for-like with continuous PTaaS — best used alongside, not instead of, a scoped continuous platform.
- Autonomous AI Pen TestingVendor profile
Horizon3 NodeZero
Autonomous internal network pen testing — AI agents chain exploits with no human in the loop.
What it does well- True autonomous exploit chaining at scale
- Strong internal network and Active Directory coverage
- Repeatable, frequent test runs without scheduling testers
What it doesn't do- Business logic and bespoke web app testing are not its sweet spot
- Some auditors still expect named human testers for sign-off
Best forEnterprises with significant internal networks who want frequent autonomous validation.PricingCustom / enterpriseOur verdictBest-in-class for autonomous internal testing. Pair with a human-led platform if your auditors need a CREST-certified name on the report.
- Continuous Attack Surface PTaaSVendor profile
Intruder
Continuous vulnerability scanning with a clean UX, CREST-listed and popular with UK and EU SaaS teams.
What it does well- Excellent onboarding and platform experience
- CREST listed, well-known to UK auditors
- Sensible defaults for external surface scanning
What it doesn't do- Primarily automated — human exploitation is limited
- Not designed as a full PTaaS replacement on its own
Best forSmaller engineering teams that need continuous external scanning without operating a scanner themselves.PricingPublished tiered subscription pricingOur verdictBest-in-class continuous scanner for teams that don't need deep human pen test delivery. Pair it with a separate pen test provider and you have a credible stack.
- AI System SecurityVendor profile
Mindgard
Automated AI red teaming platform spun out of Lancaster University research. Tests LLMs, AI agents, computer vision, audio and multimodal models against thousands of adversarial attack scenarios mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10.
What it does well- Purpose-built for AI system security — the most established dedicated platform in this emerging category
- Covers LLMs, agents, computer vision, audio and multimodal models — not just chatbots
- SOC 2 Type II certified, GDPR compliant and backed by 10+ years of Lancaster University academic research
What it doesn't do- AI systems only — no web app, API, infrastructure, SAST or SBOM testing
- Not a replacement for traditional PTaaS — completely different scope
- No CREST accreditation and no traditional pen test certificates
Best forOrganisations building or deploying LLMs, AI agents or other AI systems who need to test them for adversarial vulnerabilities before and after each model change.PricingCustom enterprise — contact for quote.Our verdictIf you are shipping AI products, Mindgard addresses a gap that no traditional PTaaS platform covers. It is not a substitute for external attack surface testing — it is a specialist tool for a specific and growing problem. Most organisations will need both.
- Enterprise Security ValidationVendor profile
Osec Incenter
Unified CTEM platform positioning itself as a replacement for multiple separate security tools — combining continuous testing across applications, networks, cloud, APIs and mobile with human pen testing services.
What it does well- Broad asset coverage including mobile, OT and IoT
- Combines automated scanning with human pen testing and red teaming under one contract
- Strong tool consolidation proposition for organisations managing many point security solutions
What it doesn't do- CREST accreditation is not confirmed — buyers in regulated environments should verify before purchasing
- Pricing is custom and enterprise-focused — no published per-asset pricing
- SBOM and Cyber Essentials Plus coverage not confirmed
Best forMid to large enterprises looking to consolidate multiple security tools and services under a single contract.PricingCustom / enterprise — contact for quote.Our verdictA broad platform with genuine ambition. Buyers with specific compliance requirements — particularly around CREST accreditation and Cyber Essentials Plus — should validate coverage before committing.
- Enterprise Security ValidationVendor profile
Pentera
Automated security validation platform that safely emulates internal network attack chains — lateral movement, privilege escalation, credential attacks and ransomware simulation.
What it does well- Genuine autonomous exploit chaining across internal networks
- Ransomware simulation against known threat groups including LockBit, REvil and BlackCat
- Continuous internal validation without disrupting production environments
What it doesn't do- External attack surface coverage is limited — the platform is built for internal network validation
- No human pen testers, no auditor-ready human-signed reports and no pen test certificates
- Requires deployment inside the network — not agentless
- Independently noted as not a replacement for conventional penetration testing
Best forLarge enterprises with dedicated internal security teams who want to continuously validate internal defences and test ransomware readiness.PricingFrom $35,000/yr — typically $50,000–$100,000+ depending on scale.Our verdictBest-in-class for internal network validation at enterprise scale. Not designed for external attack surface monitoring or compliance-grade pen testing — buyers needing both should consider whether a second platform is required.
- Continuous Attack Surface PTaaSOur service
RADAR
Continuous attack surface PTaaS combining AI-driven scanning, AI triage and CREST-certified human pen testers — delivered by a CREST accredited organisation and sold as a per-asset annual licence plus prepaid hours pack. AI recommends fixes; your team authorises or implements them.
What it does well- Delivered by a CREST accredited organisation, with AI-driven scanning and CREST-certified human pen testers exploiting findings on request
- Predictable per-asset annual licence plus prepaid hours — no quote cycle, no per-finding billing
- AI never runs autonomously inside your network: it suggests, humans decide
- Supports the pen testing requirements of PCI DSS, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, DORA and NIS2
What it doesn't do- Not a crowdsourced bug bounty marketplace
- Mobile application testing delivered through the hours pack, not as packaged software
Best forCompliance-driven organisations that want year-round assurance with auditor-ready human validation.PricingPer-asset annual licence + prepaid hours pack. Transparent — see the live pricing calculator.Our verdictWe built RADAR because the market was forcing buyers to choose between automation and accredited humans. RADAR ships both in one platform, with pricing that doesn't require a sales cycle.
- Crowdsourced PTaaSVendor profile
Synack
Elite vetted researcher network combined with a controlled testing platform and government-grade pedigree.
What it does well- Highly vetted researcher pool with strong attestations
- Used by regulated and public sector buyers
- Combined human and automated coverage
What it doesn't do- Enterprise pricing and procurement
- Less suited to small or fast-moving engineering teams
Best forRegulated enterprises and public sector buyers needing high-assurance crowdsourced testing.PricingCustom / enterpriseOur verdictStrongest crowdsourced option when researcher vetting and attestation matter as much as findings. Overkill for most mid-market SaaS.
- Enterprise Security ValidationVendor profile
XM Cyber
Continuous exposure management platform that maps attack paths across hybrid cloud and on-prem environments — identifying how an attacker could reach critical assets through chained vulnerabilities, misconfigurations and identity exposures.
What it does well- Attack path mapping is genuinely distinctive — shows how multiple weak points chain together rather than listing individual CVEs
- Strong Active Directory and cloud identity coverage
- Continuous exposure prioritisation focused on what matters most for breach prevention
What it doesn't do- Not a PTaaS platform — no active external pen testing, no human testers, no auditor-ready reports
- No pen test certificates and no compliance evidence suitable for auditors requiring human sign-off
- No web application testing, SAST or SBOM
Best forEnterprise security teams who want continuous internal attack path modelling and risk prioritisation, and already have external pen testing covered separately.PricingCustom subscription — contact for quote.Our verdictA strong and differentiated internal exposure management tool. Solves a different problem to PTaaS — buyers evaluating XM Cyber alongside PTaaS platforms should be clear about which gap each one fills.
Side by side — how the top platforms compare
Full feature-by-feature comparison of RADAR against the most-asked-about platforms. Covers continuous coverage, validation model, compliance mapping, integrations and pricing model.
| RADAR | BreachLock | Cobalt | HackerOne | Synack | NetSPI | Bishop Fox | Aikido | Cytix | Horizon3 NodeZero | Terra Security | Astra Security | Intruder | Blacklock | Osec Incenter | Pentera | Beagle Security | Edgescan | Equixly | Mindgard | XM Cyber | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CREST accredited organisation & certified testers | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✗ | ~optional | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ~optional | ✓Software | ~testers | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Auditor-ready reports | ✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✗ | ✓Human | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ✗ | ~AI systems only | ✗ |
| Pen test certificate | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Continuous monitoring | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software |
| Change-triggered testing | ✓Software | ~ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ |
| AI validation | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software |
| Human validation | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ~HitL | ✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Exploitation testing | ✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Human | ✓Software | ✓SoftwareAI only | ✓Software |
| Zero false positives | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ~ | ~ |
| Agentless deployment | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~Docker req | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ |
| External attack surface | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~API/web only | ✗ | ~ |
| Internal network testing | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Human | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Softwarecore strength | ~new | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Softwarecore strength | ✗ | ✓Software✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software |
| Web app testing | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ~early access | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ |
| API testing | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ~AI APIs only | ✗ |
| Infrastructure testing | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Human | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Software✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software |
| LLM / AI endpoints | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✓Software | ✗ |
| DAST | ✓Software | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ |
| SAST | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| SBOM | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud config review | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software |
| Mobile app testing | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ~ | ~ | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Red team / adversarial sim | ✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✓SoftwareAI only | ~ |
| Social engineering | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug bounty / crowdsourced | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pen testing for PCI DSS | ✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pen testing for ISO 27001 | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ~ | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pen testing for SOC 2 | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software | ~ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pen testing for Cyber Essentials Plus | ✓Software✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pen testing for DORA / NIS2 | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Pen testing for HIPAA | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software✓Human | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ✗ | ✓Human | ✗ | ~ | ✓Human | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Transparent pricing | ✓Software✓Human | ✓Software | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓Software | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Feature information based on publicly available data, June 2026. If you spot an error contact hello@disruptorscyber.com
How to choose the right platform for your organisation
If yes, you need CREST-certified human testers. Automated reports alone won't satisfy PCI DSS, ISO 27001 or Cyber Essentials Plus auditors.
Count your web apps, APIs, infrastructure and cloud assets. Per-asset pricing models like RADAR scale cleanly. Crowdsourced models are harder to scope.
Most platforms are external-first. Internal testing requires either a reverse proxy setup or on-site agent deployment. Ask vendors specifically.
Not all platforms map to DORA, NIS2 or Cyber Essentials Plus. Check explicitly, not just SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
If not, you need a platform that does the triage for you — AI + human validation. Raw scanner output without validation will overwhelm a non-security team.
Annual per-asset licence vs enterprise contract vs crowdsourced credits. Per-asset is most predictable for growing organisations.
Not sure which platform is right for you?
Book a free 30-minute call with the Disruptors team. No sales process. No obligation. We'll tell you honestly whether RADAR is the right fit — and if it isn't, we'll point you in the right direction.
Book a Meeting

