Editorial · Continuous Pen Testing

Top 18 Continuous Penetration Testing Platforms in 2026

Not all PTaaS platforms are the same. Some test web apps. Some test networks. Some use AI. Some use humans. This guide breaks down what each platform actually does — so you can choose the one that matches what you actually need.

By the Disruptors Cyber Security Team · June 2026 · 20 min read
Feature information verified against publicly available vendor information, June 2026.

Contents

This guide covers the six platform categories, then reviews each of the top 18 continuous penetration testing platforms using the same format — strengths, gaps, best fit, pricing and a Our verdict.

Autonomous AI Pen Testing
  • Aikido
  • Beagle Security
  • Equixly
  • Horizon3 NodeZero
Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS
  • Astra Security
  • Blacklock
  • BreachLock
  • Edgescan
  • Intruder
  • RADAR
Crowdsourced PTaaS
  • Cobalt
  • HackerOne
  • Synack
Enterprise Security Validation
  • NetSPI
  • Bishop Fox
  • Osec Incenter
  • Pentera
  • XM Cyber
Developer-First Security
  • Cytix
AI System Security
  • Mindgard
What to compare
  • Side-by-side comparison
  • How to choose
  • Talk to Disruptors

Why most PTaaS comparisons get it wrong

Most "best PTaaS" lists rank platforms as if they all compete for the same use case. They don't. The continuous penetration testing market splits into five distinct categories, and a buyer choosing the wrong category wastes budget and leaves real gaps in coverage. A crowdsourced bug bounty platform is not a substitute for CREST-certified pen testing. An autonomous AI scanner is not a substitute for a human validating business logic. A developer-first AppSec tool is not a substitute for an external attack surface programme.

Below we break the market down into the six categories that actually matter, then review the top 18 platforms in 2026 — including BreachLock, Cobalt, HackerOne, Intruder, Aikido, NodeZero, Blacklock, Edgescan, Beagle Security, Equixly, Osec Incenter, Pentera, XM Cyber, Mindgard and others — using the same honest format for each.

The six categories

Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

Always-on external and internal scanning with human validation on demand. Best for compliance-driven organisations needing year-round assurance.

Examples: RADAR, Astra Security, Intruder, Blacklock, Edgescan
Autonomous AI Pen Testing

AI agents that attempt full exploit chains without a human in the loop. Strong breadth, weaker on business logic and compliance sign-off.

Examples: Horizon3 NodeZero, Aikido, Terra Security, Beagle Security, Equixly
Crowdsourced PTaaS

Marketplace of vetted researchers paid per finding. Good for breadth, harder to use for compliance.

Examples: HackerOne, Cobalt, Synack, Bugcrowd
Enterprise Security Validation

Deep internal network testing, Active Directory, lateral movement. Built for large enterprise with dedicated security teams.

Examples: NetSPI, Bishop Fox, Osec Incenter, Pentera, XM Cyber
Developer-First Security

SAST, DAST and code review integrated into CI/CD. Built for engineering teams, not security buyers.

Examples: Cytix, CodeAnt AI
AI System Security

Specialist platforms for testing LLMs, AI agents and AI applications against adversarial attacks. A distinct and growing category separate from traditional PTaaS — designed for organisations building or deploying AI products.

Examples: Mindgard

The top 18 platforms in 2026

Not ranked. Order is alphabetical so no platform or service looks like it is being placed first. Same honest format for every vendor — where RADAR has gaps we say so.

  • Vendor profile

    Aikido

    Autonomous AI Pen Testing

    Developer-first AI security platform unifying SAST, DAST, secrets and cloud posture with autonomous testing features.

    What it does well
    • Excellent developer UX and CI/CD integration
    • Consolidates multiple AppSec tools into one console
    • Fast time to first finding
    What it doesn't do
    • Not positioned as accredited human pen test delivery
    • Compliance evidence still typically needs a separate human test
    Best for
    Engineering-led organisations consolidating AppSec tooling under one roof.
    Pricing
    Published tiered subscription pricing
    Our verdict

    A genuinely strong developer-first platform. If your buyer is the CTO, Aikido is hard to beat. If your buyer is a CISO with an auditor at the door, you'll still need a human pen test layer.

  • Vendor profile

    Astra Security

    Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

    CREST-certified hybrid AI + human PTaaS targeting web, API, mobile and cloud, with a developer-friendly portal.

    What it does well
    • CREST certified with a clear hybrid AI + human model
    • Good coverage of web, API, mobile and cloud in one platform
    • Transparent published pricing tiers
    What it doesn't do
    • Internal network testing depth varies vs enterprise-focused vendors
    • Smaller UK / EU footprint than locally-anchored providers
    Best for
    Engineering-led companies wanting hybrid testing and a developer-friendly findings flow.
    Pricing
    Published tiered subscription pricing
    Our verdict

    A strong, honest competitor in the same hybrid lane as RADAR. The service is good — the deciding factor is usually who you trust to validate findings against your compliance frameworks.

  • Vendor profile

    Beagle Security

    Autonomous AI Pen Testing

    Agentic AI penetration testing platform for web applications and APIs, trained on 350,000+ real-world pen test workflows. Continuous, developer-friendly and transparently priced.

    What it does well
    • Genuinely transparent published pricing — rare in this market
    • Strong CI/CD integration for developer and DevSecOps teams
    • Claims zero false positives through AI-driven exploit confirmation
    What it doesn't do
    • Web apps and APIs only — no infrastructure, network, SAST, SBOM or mobile testing
    • No human pen testers — AI validation only, no CREST certified sign-off
    • No auditor-ready human-signed reports or pen test certificates
    Best for
    Dev and DevSecOps teams at SaaS companies wanting continuous automated application security testing at transparent subscription pricing.
    Pricing
    Essential $119/mo · Advanced $359/mo · Enterprise custom.
    Our verdict

    A well-priced entry point for continuous AI-driven web and API testing. The coverage is deliberately narrow — buyers needing infrastructure testing, human validation or compliance-grade reports will need to look elsewhere or pair it with another platform.

  • Vendor profile

    Blacklock

    Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

    Automated continuous penetration testing platform combining 24+ pen testing tools with AI-powered triage across web apps, APIs, infrastructure, LLM endpoints, SAST and SBOM.

    What it does well
    • Broad asset coverage including LLM/AI endpoints and SBOM — uncommon in this category
    • AI triage reduces false positives before findings reach the security team
    • Agentless by design — nothing to install, no changes to infrastructure required
    What it doesn't do
    • No built-in human pen test layer — validation and exploitation require a separate service or partner
    • Not sold direct to end buyers in most markets — accessed through authorised resellers and distributors
    • Auditor-ready human-signed reports and pen test certificates require a human layer on top
    Best for
    Managed service providers, resellers and distributors building a continuous pen testing offering on top of a capable automated platform.
    Pricing
    Per-asset annual licence through authorised channel partners — not published direct.
    Our verdict

    A capable and genuinely broad automated platform. The software does the heavy lifting — buyers who also need human validation, auditor-ready reports or a pen test certificate will need to confirm what their chosen partner provides on top.

  • Vendor profile

    BreachLock

    Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

    Hybrid AI + human PTaaS with a broad services menu spanning web, API, network, cloud and red team.

    What it does well
    • Wide service catalogue under one contract
    • In-house testers and a unified findings dashboard
    • Strong presence with US mid-market and enterprise buyers
    What it doesn't do
    • Pricing is quote-based and varies significantly by scope
    • Less transparent on CREST coverage than UK-anchored providers
    Best for
    Buyers who want a single vendor to cover many test types under one contract.
    Pricing
    Custom / enterprise
    Our verdict

    Strong breadth and a credible hybrid model. If you want a long supplier list collapsed to one, BreachLock is a serious option — just expect a real procurement cycle.

  • Vendor profile

    Cobalt

    Crowdsourced PTaaS

    Pioneer PTaaS platform built on a vetted researcher pool with a structured pentest workflow.

    What it does well
    • Established PTaaS workflow with predictable test windows
    • Vetted researcher network
    • Good integrations into developer tooling
    What it doesn't do
    • Engagements are time-boxed rather than truly continuous
    • Pricing scales quickly with scope and frequency
    Best for
    Teams that want pen tests delivered as a service but in defined sprints.
    Pricing
    Credit-based / custom
    Our verdict

    Helped define the PTaaS category. If your model is several scoped tests per year inside a platform, Cobalt is a safe choice. Continuous coverage is where it gets expensive.

  • Vendor profile

    Cytix

    Developer-First Security

    Change-triggered continuous testing that fires pen tests when code or infrastructure changes.

    What it does well
    • Tests triggered by real change events, not arbitrary schedules
    • Tight fit with modern CI/CD workflows
    • Reduces wasted testing on unchanged surface area
    What it doesn't do
    • Newer entrant — smaller install base than incumbents
    • Best for organisations already operating mature DevSecOps
    Best for
    Engineering-led teams that want pen testing to follow deployment events.
    Pricing
    Custom
    Our verdict

    A clever model that fits modern release cadences. Most useful as part of a stack rather than a single answer to compliance-grade pen testing.

  • Vendor profile

    Edgescan

    Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

    CREST accredited continuous PTaaS platform combining automated scanning, AI-powered validation and in-house CREST and OSCP certified pen testers across web apps, APIs, infrastructure, mobile and cloud. ISO 27001 certified.

    What it does well
    • CREST accredited organisation with CREST and OSCP certified in-house testers — all full-time employees, not freelancers
    • Genuinely broad coverage including mobile application testing (iOS and Android) built into the platform
    • Unlimited retesting included as standard — no additional cost per retest
    What it doesn't do
    • Pricing is not published — all quotes are custom, which adds friction for buyers wanting transparent per-asset costs
    • Less well known in the UK mid-market than some US-origin competitors despite CREST accreditation
    Best for
    Organisations wanting a CREST accredited continuous PTaaS platform with broad coverage including mobile, and in-house testers rather than a crowdsourced or freelance model.
    Pricing
    Custom — contact for quote.
    Our verdict

    One of the more credible full-stack PTaaS options in the market. CREST accreditation, in-house testers and mobile coverage in a single platform are a strong combination. Pricing opacity is the main friction point for buyers who want to self-serve a quote.

  • Vendor profile

    Equixly

    Autonomous AI Pen Testing

    Agentic AI platform purpose-built for continuous API and web application penetration testing. Founded 2022, Florence-based, raised €10M Series A in December 2025 and expanding to the UK in 2026.

    What it does well
    • Purpose-built for API-first architectures — stronger on API business logic testing than general DAST tools
    • Continuous autonomous testing with no fixed scope or testing window
    • ISO 27001 certified with partnerships with Wiz and Checkmarx
    What it doesn't do
    • APIs and web applications only — no infrastructure, network, mobile, SAST or SBOM
    • No human pen testers and no CREST accreditation
    • No auditor-ready human-signed reports or pen test certificates
    Best for
    Enterprise organisations with complex API-first architectures who want continuous autonomous API security testing embedded in their SDLC.
    Pricing
    Custom — contact for quote. One-off test options also available.
    Our verdict

    A technically strong platform for API-heavy environments. The AI approach to business logic testing is genuinely differentiated from standard DAST tools. Compliance-driven buyers and those needing broader coverage beyond APIs will need to supplement with other platforms.

  • Vendor profile

    HackerOne

    Crowdsourced PTaaS

    The category-defining crowdsourced platform, now extended with agentic AI triage and pentest services.

    What it does well
    • Largest researcher community in the market
    • Mature triage workflows and disclosure tooling
    • Strong brand with enterprise security teams
    What it doesn't do
    • Per-finding economics can be unpredictable
    • Crowdsourced reports don't always map cleanly to compliance scopes
    Best for
    Mature security teams running ongoing public or private bug bounty programmes.
    Pricing
    Custom / enterprise (plus per-finding payouts)
    Our verdict

    Unmatched for crowdsourced breadth. Not a like-for-like with continuous PTaaS — best used alongside, not instead of, a scoped continuous platform.

  • Vendor profile

    Horizon3 NodeZero

    Autonomous AI Pen Testing

    Autonomous internal network pen testing — AI agents chain exploits with no human in the loop.

    What it does well
    • True autonomous exploit chaining at scale
    • Strong internal network and Active Directory coverage
    • Repeatable, frequent test runs without scheduling testers
    What it doesn't do
    • Business logic and bespoke web app testing are not its sweet spot
    • Some auditors still expect named human testers for sign-off
    Best for
    Enterprises with significant internal networks who want frequent autonomous validation.
    Pricing
    Custom / enterprise
    Our verdict

    Best-in-class for autonomous internal testing. Pair with a human-led platform if your auditors need a CREST-certified name on the report.

  • Vendor profile

    Intruder

    Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

    Continuous vulnerability scanning with a clean UX, CREST-listed and popular with UK and EU SaaS teams.

    What it does well
    • Excellent onboarding and platform experience
    • CREST listed, well-known to UK auditors
    • Sensible defaults for external surface scanning
    What it doesn't do
    • Primarily automated — human exploitation is limited
    • Not designed as a full PTaaS replacement on its own
    Best for
    Smaller engineering teams that need continuous external scanning without operating a scanner themselves.
    Pricing
    Published tiered subscription pricing
    Our verdict

    Best-in-class continuous scanner for teams that don't need deep human pen test delivery. Pair it with a separate pen test provider and you have a credible stack.

  • Vendor profile

    Mindgard

    AI System Security

    Automated AI red teaming platform spun out of Lancaster University research. Tests LLMs, AI agents, computer vision, audio and multimodal models against thousands of adversarial attack scenarios mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10.

    What it does well
    • Purpose-built for AI system security — the most established dedicated platform in this emerging category
    • Covers LLMs, agents, computer vision, audio and multimodal models — not just chatbots
    • SOC 2 Type II certified, GDPR compliant and backed by 10+ years of Lancaster University academic research
    What it doesn't do
    • AI systems only — no web app, API, infrastructure, SAST or SBOM testing
    • Not a replacement for traditional PTaaS — completely different scope
    • No CREST accreditation and no traditional pen test certificates
    Best for
    Organisations building or deploying LLMs, AI agents or other AI systems who need to test them for adversarial vulnerabilities before and after each model change.
    Pricing
    Custom enterprise — contact for quote.
    Our verdict

    If you are shipping AI products, Mindgard addresses a gap that no traditional PTaaS platform covers. It is not a substitute for external attack surface testing — it is a specialist tool for a specific and growing problem. Most organisations will need both.

  • Vendor profile

    Osec Incenter

    Enterprise Security Validation

    Unified CTEM platform positioning itself as a replacement for multiple separate security tools — combining continuous testing across applications, networks, cloud, APIs and mobile with human pen testing services.

    What it does well
    • Broad asset coverage including mobile, OT and IoT
    • Combines automated scanning with human pen testing and red teaming under one contract
    • Strong tool consolidation proposition for organisations managing many point security solutions
    What it doesn't do
    • CREST accreditation is not confirmed — buyers in regulated environments should verify before purchasing
    • Pricing is custom and enterprise-focused — no published per-asset pricing
    • SBOM and Cyber Essentials Plus coverage not confirmed
    Best for
    Mid to large enterprises looking to consolidate multiple security tools and services under a single contract.
    Pricing
    Custom / enterprise — contact for quote.
    Our verdict

    A broad platform with genuine ambition. Buyers with specific compliance requirements — particularly around CREST accreditation and Cyber Essentials Plus — should validate coverage before committing.

  • Vendor profile

    Pentera

    Enterprise Security Validation

    Automated security validation platform that safely emulates internal network attack chains — lateral movement, privilege escalation, credential attacks and ransomware simulation.

    What it does well
    • Genuine autonomous exploit chaining across internal networks
    • Ransomware simulation against known threat groups including LockBit, REvil and BlackCat
    • Continuous internal validation without disrupting production environments
    What it doesn't do
    • External attack surface coverage is limited — the platform is built for internal network validation
    • No human pen testers, no auditor-ready human-signed reports and no pen test certificates
    • Requires deployment inside the network — not agentless
    • Independently noted as not a replacement for conventional penetration testing
    Best for
    Large enterprises with dedicated internal security teams who want to continuously validate internal defences and test ransomware readiness.
    Pricing
    From $35,000/yr — typically $50,000–$100,000+ depending on scale.
    Our verdict

    Best-in-class for internal network validation at enterprise scale. Not designed for external attack surface monitoring or compliance-grade pen testing — buyers needing both should consider whether a second platform is required.

  • Our service

    RADAR

    Continuous Attack Surface PTaaS

    Continuous attack surface PTaaS combining AI-driven scanning, AI triage and CREST-certified human pen testers — delivered by a CREST accredited organisation and sold as a per-asset annual licence plus prepaid hours pack. AI recommends fixes; your team authorises or implements them.

    What it does well
    • Delivered by a CREST accredited organisation, with AI-driven scanning and CREST-certified human pen testers exploiting findings on request
    • Predictable per-asset annual licence plus prepaid hours — no quote cycle, no per-finding billing
    • AI never runs autonomously inside your network: it suggests, humans decide
    • Supports the pen testing requirements of PCI DSS, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, DORA and NIS2
    What it doesn't do
    • Not a crowdsourced bug bounty marketplace
    • Mobile application testing delivered through the hours pack, not as packaged software
    Best for
    Compliance-driven organisations that want year-round assurance with auditor-ready human validation.
    Pricing
    Per-asset annual licence + prepaid hours pack. Transparent — see the live pricing calculator.
    Our verdict

    We built RADAR because the market was forcing buyers to choose between automation and accredited humans. RADAR ships both in one platform, with pricing that doesn't require a sales cycle.

  • Vendor profile

    Synack

    Crowdsourced PTaaS

    Elite vetted researcher network combined with a controlled testing platform and government-grade pedigree.

    What it does well
    • Highly vetted researcher pool with strong attestations
    • Used by regulated and public sector buyers
    • Combined human and automated coverage
    What it doesn't do
    • Enterprise pricing and procurement
    • Less suited to small or fast-moving engineering teams
    Best for
    Regulated enterprises and public sector buyers needing high-assurance crowdsourced testing.
    Pricing
    Custom / enterprise
    Our verdict

    Strongest crowdsourced option when researcher vetting and attestation matter as much as findings. Overkill for most mid-market SaaS.

  • Vendor profile

    XM Cyber

    Enterprise Security Validation

    Continuous exposure management platform that maps attack paths across hybrid cloud and on-prem environments — identifying how an attacker could reach critical assets through chained vulnerabilities, misconfigurations and identity exposures.

    What it does well
    • Attack path mapping is genuinely distinctive — shows how multiple weak points chain together rather than listing individual CVEs
    • Strong Active Directory and cloud identity coverage
    • Continuous exposure prioritisation focused on what matters most for breach prevention
    What it doesn't do
    • Not a PTaaS platform — no active external pen testing, no human testers, no auditor-ready reports
    • No pen test certificates and no compliance evidence suitable for auditors requiring human sign-off
    • No web application testing, SAST or SBOM
    Best for
    Enterprise security teams who want continuous internal attack path modelling and risk prioritisation, and already have external pen testing covered separately.
    Pricing
    Custom subscription — contact for quote.
    Our verdict

    A strong and differentiated internal exposure management tool. Solves a different problem to PTaaS — buyers evaluating XM Cyber alongside PTaaS platforms should be clear about which gap each one fills.

Side by side — how the top platforms compare

Full feature-by-feature comparison of RADAR against the most-asked-about platforms. Covers continuous coverage, validation model, compliance mapping, integrations and pricing model.

Feature information verified against publicly available vendor information, June 2026.Column order is not a ranking; RADAR is highlighted for comparison.
Software Automated by platformHuman Delivered by pen tester~ Partial Not available
RADARBreachLockCobaltHackerOneSynackNetSPIBishop FoxAikidoCytixHorizon3 NodeZeroTerra SecurityAstra SecurityIntruderBlacklockOsec IncenterPenteraBeagle SecurityEdgescanEquixlyMindgardXM Cyber
CREST accredited organisation & certified testersHumanHumanHuman~optionalHuman~optionalSoftware~testersSoftware
Auditor-ready reportsHuman~~Human~~~~Human~~~~Human~AI systems only
Pen test certificateHumanHumanHumanHuman
Continuous monitoringSoftwareSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware
Change-triggered testingSoftware~~SoftwareSoftwareHuman~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware
AI validationSoftwareSoftware~~Software~~Software~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware
Human validationHumanHumanHumanHumanSoftwareHumanHumanHumanHuman~HitLHuman~HumanHuman
Exploitation testingHumanSoftwareHumanHumanHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareAI onlySoftware
Zero false positivesSoftwareHuman~~~~~~Software~~~SoftwareSoftwareSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftware~~
Agentless deploymentSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware~Docker reqSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware~
External attack surfaceSoftwareSoftware~~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware~SoftwareSoftware~API/web only~
Internal network testingSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanHuman~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwarecore strength~new~~~SoftwareHumanSoftwarecore strengthSoftwareHumanSoftware
Web app testingSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareHuman~early accessSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHuman~SoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftware
API testingSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareHuman~SoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHuman~SoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftware~AI APIs only
Infrastructure testingSoftwareSoftwareHumanHuman~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftware
LLM / AI endpointsSoftware~SoftwareSoftware~~Software
DASTSoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareSoftware
SASTSoftware~SoftwareHuman~Software~~Software~
SBOMSoftware~Software
Cloud config reviewHumanHumanHuman~HumanHuman~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareHuman~HumanSoftware
Mobile app testingHumanHumanHuman~~HumanHumanHumanHumanHuman
Red team / adversarial simHuman~HumanSoftwareHumanHumanHumanSoftware~HumanSoftware~SoftwareAI only~
Social engineeringHumanHuman~Human
Bug bounty / crowdsourcedHumanHumanHuman
Pen testing for PCI DSSHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~~~Software~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~Human
Pen testing for ISO 27001SoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~Software~~~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~Human
Pen testing for SOC 2SoftwareHumanSoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~Software~Software~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~Human
Pen testing for Cyber Essentials PlusSoftwareHuman~~
Pen testing for DORA / NIS2SoftwareHuman~~Software~~
Pen testing for HIPAASoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~SoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~SoftwareSoftwareHumanSoftwareHuman~Human
Transparent pricingSoftwareHumanSoftware~SoftwareSoftwareSoftwareSoftware

Feature information based on publicly available data, June 2026. If you spot an error contact hello@disruptorscyber.com

How to choose the right platform for your organisation

Do you need auditor-accepted reports?

If yes, you need CREST-certified human testers. Automated reports alone won't satisfy PCI DSS, ISO 27001 or Cyber Essentials Plus auditors.

How big is your external attack surface?

Count your web apps, APIs, infrastructure and cloud assets. Per-asset pricing models like RADAR scale cleanly. Crowdsourced models are harder to scope.

Do you need internal network testing?

Most platforms are external-first. Internal testing requires either a reverse proxy setup or on-site agent deployment. Ask vendors specifically.

What compliance frameworks do you need to satisfy?

Not all platforms map to DORA, NIS2 or Cyber Essentials Plus. Check explicitly, not just SOC 2 and ISO 27001.

Do you have an internal security team?

If not, you need a platform that does the triage for you — AI + human validation. Raw scanner output without validation will overwhelm a non-security team.

What's your budget model?

Annual per-asset licence vs enterprise contract vs crowdsourced credits. Per-asset is most predictable for growing organisations.

Not sure which platform is right for you?

Book a free 30-minute call with the Disruptors team. No sales process. No obligation. We'll tell you honestly whether RADAR is the right fit — and if it isn't, we'll point you in the right direction.

Book a Meeting
Further reading: RADAR overview